Le Chateaubriand and Rock-Star Chef Inaki Aizpitarte!
Tuesday, March 1, 2011 at 09:16AM It is Friday night and our dinner tonight is at Le Chateaubriand, probably one of most anticipated meals of the trip. The anticipation has been aroused by the reputation of the place due the rock-star status of the chef, Inakii Aizpitarte, a young Basque who has garnered high praise for his daring and inventive cooking. Like most of the “bistronomiques” we have visited this week, the dining room was small, about 40 seats, maybe 45, and completely lacking in décor – clearly these chefs have decided to make the food the focus. This was the only restaurant with a totally fixed menu, no a la carte choices and no options on the chefs menu whatsoever, the only choice you get is to either take the wine pairings offered with each course or order your own bottle (we went with the pairings). The staff was young, knowledgeable, affable and English speaking, each dish the menu was explained to us in detail and then it was off to the races.
To confirm the status of Le Chateaubriand as "hot" suffice it to say that Chef Rene Redzepi was there that evening as well, so we were in the house with the chef of the #1 restaurant in the world! His place NOMA in Copenhagen bumped El Bulli from the top spot after a 10 year run. So we had Bistro Rollin checking it out and NOMA. NOMA was in good company!
There were four, count ‘em, four amuse bouche, and a "pre-amuse-bouche" which interesting for a cutting edge restaurant were a proto-typical traditional gougeres. The classic pate choux cheese puffs. These were lovely and excellent.
Then on the real amuse-bouche! The first was described as “live” baby shrimp quickly pan fried and served without adornment, they were tasty but nothing really special.
The next amuse was a small dish of haddock ceviche, clean and refreshing indeed but once again….just good, nothing GREAT about it – (thought as you will see from the empty bowls - we were so wrapped up in this food we forgot the picture until all three of us had downed them!)
Our thought was maybe this multi-course extravaganza was going to be a slow build that culminated in culinary fireworks – and besides, these were just the amuse bouche. Next and last of this first wave was a small piece of burrata w/ a few dried capers….and once again, meh….!
So on from the amuse bouche to the menu items…and here we really got going, first course was raw scallops with tamarind powder and purple potatoes – the dish was outstanding, the texture of the potatoes melding perfectly with the scallops, the tamarind powder providing a bracing finish.
But as quickly as the meal took off it the meal stalled – the next course of steamed turbot with a jus iberique was gorgeous as you will see belwo but when it came to taste - just OK - but nothing memorable. The blandness was continuing, not at all what we were anticipating!
And the final course of a take-off on veal blanquette that’s was flavored with smoked hay (huh?) and a foam of some sort fell completely flat. We all had to add salt and then it picked up. I think something went seriously wrong with this preparation in the kitchen!
The cheese course was classic and very good.
And the desserts were tasty (by this time we were so disappointed that we were trying to figure out what was going on a forgot to take pictures of the desserts!) But, it is hard to describe this meal as anything but a letdown. ……I wonder what Chef Redzepi thought? In a conversation with another chef in Paris about our meal, he agreed that as much as he liked Chef Aizpitarte, he didn't like what he was doing at Le Chateaubriand
The wines, although very unusual were paired extremely well with the dishes. A couple of times we remarked that although we didn’t love the wines by themselves when we first tasted them, once we had a bite of food they made a lot of sense.
For you oenophiles;
Cuvee’ Prestige (Savignin) Jura, J.F. Ganevat
Ribolla Gravener (Ribolla Gialla, Sauvignon Blanc), Francesco Josko
Chambolle Musigny (Pinot Noir), Fred Cossard
So although I believe its unfair to judge a restaurant by just one meal, La Chateuabriand would rank towards the bottom of our experiences this trip, we’ll see what Inaki is up to next time we are in town – maybe we just caught him on an off night.
Paul Bratone
Reader Comments (7)
I have seen many posts similar to this one on internet but all other have filler content and are not up-to-the mark. This post especially made me to post my comments as its credible, fendi shoes it’s very good!
le Salon de L'agriculture is a must see as a chef i spend two days there and enjoyed all of it .i have been in Paris since Jan, and i know when i come home at the end of the summer the one place that will make food as great as it is will be Bistro Rollin.Deb
Pretty good article. replica rolex watch
I just came across your site and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Any way I’ll be coming back and I hope you post again soon.thanks for sharing. replica rolex
For shoes, I do not have a special feeling, childhood home condition is poor, wear shoes is mother and sister on hand to do my cloth shoes, summer is a party mouth single shoes, winter is key padded boots, thick stupidly reality. That moment villagers about shoes regardless of feet, convenient, economy. I'm a young friends and his mother are sewing slow, he is always a watched pot, a new shoes make to him put on, and the other one to come, he this shoe is some old, people always think his two shoes is not the same thing.
replica jimmy choo shoesShoes parable love, reflected the secrets of the love and experience. In the most low body shoes, fate and adjust, coordination and company, travel and mutual aid, pressure load bearing, the extent of the tough, embodies the love of incisively and vividly the characteristics. The two were not involved of the men and women, because love and together, made up of the family was doomed to wind and rain after test. If two shoes is as target of unity and opposite restriction; Both steps to follow up, and inevitable orderly; If there has gone hand in hand with both feet or single feet jump, that is a problem. Whether comfortable shoes, only the feet know; The love of the suffering of joy, only men and women both parties clear. Once the toes to come out, it shows that love or marriage problems.
replica jimmy choo shoesLove and marriage is endurance. A pair of shoes to the old by the new, concrete go much road, the soles of the feet make as many bubble, only oneself know. Because of the difference of the conditions, often can cause shoes and the contradiction of the foot, some still out feet sweat. So, the insole became a love of regulators. But, the insole is the insole, once the insole foot against a shoes outside, the old shoes this change new shoes, this is normal marriage or love changes. Just, in the face of fast rhythm market economy and shoes mechanization batch production, those who once the pure process and quality more let person nostalgia.
Today, I want to talk about a hot phenomenon in modern society, that is a new controversial marriage style, named married with children.game of thrones dvd set
In modern life, there are so many cold cases hard to be solved as little clues left in the crime scenes and the suspects have already escape far, far away.supernatural season 6 dvd
Your website have very interesting article. I got knowledge from here. Besides that, your blog is so popular among the searchers from search enginesswiss rolex replica make you feel good .swiss rolex replica is good!